But, now it's time to move on. So this changes the whole dynamic of the season for the Pats. They were a powerhouse team, and anything worse than 14-2 would have been a disappointment. Now we need to look back to the lesser days of Patriots fanhood. Remember what it was like before excellence was assured? We still loved football season back then, didn't we? Here are some reasons why 2008 might not be a total loss:
1. Bill Belichick is still in charge. This may sound trivial, but it's really not. This is the best NFL coach ever. He can get more out of a given group of players than anyone else. No other team's fans have ever had the luxury of this knowledge. BB won't be around forever. I'm going to enjoy every team he coaches, no matter what. In Bill I trust.
2. Now we can get excited about rookies/the pressure is off. Beforehand the thinking was "the rookies are going to hurt our chance of a perfect season". Now a perfect season seams pretty unlikely, so we can afford to develop these young guys. Now begins the Jerod Mayo ROTY watch. Now I can get pumped every time Terrence Wheatley makes a hit. Rookies are fun, remember... you never know how good they might be.
3. Maybe, just maybe, Matt Cassell is good. Ok, so Tom Brady is coming off of the best season a quarterback has ever put forth. It's not like we're going to get another "surprise improvement" like the Brady/Bledsoe switch in 2001. But let's also remember that before the 2007 season, a lot of people were still calling Brady a "system quarterback". As Bill Belichick said the other day, the two most important skills in the position are making good decisions, and accuracy. There's never been as good of a decision-maker as #12, and Cassell has been working side-by-side with him for 4 years. Maybe Moss and Welker can pick up the slack a little bit, the passing game can go back to the old economical system of throwing hard short passes that are are tough to pick... we won two superbowls doing this, and our #1 tailback was Antoine Smith. Seriously!
4. Speaking of tailbacks... Last week, I discussed Belichick's odd decision of keeping around 5 different viable running backs. It sure makes him look prescient now. The running game looked really good last week, against a line anchored by Glenn Dorsey. The Maroney, Morris, Jordan (Morris looks particularly impressive) trifecta presents a real problem for defenses. The Pats can have a fresh back in every down, and these guys can bruise. If a lapse of concentration occurs, Maroney can cover a lot of ground awfully fast.
5. The defense might be really good. So last year we were worried about the age of linebackers, and Jerod Mayo goes a long way to shore up that problem. The Pats have the option of running a 4-3 with Seymour, Wilfork, Warren, and Green (maybe the best D-line in football), and Mayo, Vrabel and Thomas to back them up. That's a fearsome front 7. Bruschi may be slowing down, but this coincides with the possibility that Eric Alexander (whose playing time gradually increased last year) is ready to take up the role. Obviously there's some concern with the secondary, because of youth. But this group might have actually gotten more talented than last year. Despite all the talk about losing Samuel, Wilson and Gay, two of the three were injured for large portions of their time with the Pats. Asante used to be a free 5 yard out, and it was only last year that he really mastered the risk/reward of route jumping. Deltha is not that long removed from his pro bowl seasons. Hobbs and Sanders are maturing. Wheatley could be a stud... work with me here....
No comments:
Post a Comment